6/6/2023 0 Comments Critique of pure reason online![]() It took place in the antiquity-in the works of Plato and Aristotle. The problem of this paper can be also articulated with help of this question: What is the real achievement of CPR as seen from bird-eye view-from the perspective of the 2500 years of history of Western philosophy? Our concern will be what Kant really revolutionised in philosophy what were the intuitions, understandings and theories that he radically changed in it? So far, this interpretation was mentioned in the literature only cursorily and only in relation to the transcendental dialectics. ![]() Further, we shall show that this is the old Plato’s idea of peirastic dialectics-of an examination of any suggested argument or theory, but also of facts and events under consideration-that Kant revived for good. More precisely, we are going to show that according to Kant, the spontaneity of pure reason is only secured if it is accepted that it recurrently examines the world. Schmitz’s book book, however, did not specify the theoretical resources with which he made this. ![]() Indeed, in CPR Kant wanted to secure the spontaneity of reason. In this paper we will see that Hermann Schmitz’s answer to his question is correct. Some fifteen years ago Hermann Schmitz asked the question ‘What did Kant really want?’ ( Was wollte Kant ?) His answer was: in his critical philosophy Kant wanted to theoretically ground the spontaneity of Reason. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |